Inspirational Equality - UPDATE

[Joshua]

Yet another round of new wording has been proposed for consideration:

"Each competitor in a Royal List must be fighting for a prospective consort of the opposite sex unless the Crown has elected to permit a competitor to fight for a prospective consort of the same sex. No one may take part in the list as both competitor and also consort.”

The reasoning can be found in this article:

http://eastkingdomgazette.org/2012/10/2 ... d-meeting/

Again, send your comments to the BoD at comments@sca.org by DECEMBER 1.

[Joshua]

Just a reminder, if you haven't yet done so, you have until Dec. 1 (THIS SATURDAY!) to send your comments to the Board of Directors about the new proposed wording:

Current language reads:

"Each competitor in a Royal List must be fighting for a consort of the opposite gender."

New Proposed Language:

"Each competitor in a Royal List must be fighting for a prospective consort of the opposite sex unless the Crown has elected to permit a competitor to fight for a prospective consort of the same sex"

Commentary can be sent to comments@sca.org with “Same-Gender Consort Proposal” in the subject line.

(Additionally, another sentence has also been proposed to be added:

"No one may take part in the list as both competitor and also consort."

The BoD is also taking commentary on this addition as well.)